Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Klein v. Jelly Belly Candy Company
as 1:2022cv11825
Plaintiff:
David Klein
Defendant:
Jelly Belly Candy Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Worcester Interfaith, Inc. et al v. City of Worcester, Massachusetts et al
as 4:2021cv40015
Plaintiff:
Nelly Medina, Ruth Rodriguez-Fay, Delia Vega and others
Defendant:
Candy Mero-Carlson, John Stewart, Worcester Board of Election Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barton et al v. Woods Hole Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority
as 1:2020cv11138
Plaintiff:
Michelle Barton, Finty Barton, Tye Barton, By and Through His Mother and Next Friend, Candy Barton and others
Defendant:
Woods Hole Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Followill v. Rayfield
as 1:2020cv10130
Plaintiff:
Candi M Followill
Defendant:
Michael A Rayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Landy et al v. SunPath Ltd.
as 1:2019cv12562
Plaintiff:
CANDY WORKMAN and BRENNAN LANDY
Defendant:
SUNPATH LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London Subcribing to Policy No. XSZ46404 v. The Maverick Street Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12059
Defendant:
Jose Maria Espana, Acorn Development LLC, Eloy Romero and others
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London Subcribing to Policy No. XSZ46404
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Main et al v. Round Hill Investments LLC et al
as 1:2018cv11586
Defendant:
Round Hill Investments LLC and Sweethearts Candy Co. LLC
Plaintiff:
Dexter Main and Francesco D'Amelio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Gillette v. Zimmer, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11162
Plaintiff:
Candis A Gillette
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc., Biomet, Inc., Zimmer US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De Gennaro et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2015cv40165
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Charles S De Gennaro and Candy Mei Tak Lo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
