Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03300
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Canty v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq01373
Special Master: Randi Ellis
Plaintiff: Alphonza Canty
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Canty et al v. Ravinia Reading Center
as 1:2022cv06077
Plaintiff: Meredith Canty and Kristina Parro
Defendant: Ravinia Reading Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Akers v. True et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00592
Defendant: Katherine Siereveld, 1 - 9 Does, Sarah Canty and others
Plaintiff: Montgomery Carl Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Carpenter et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Plaintiff: Derek Carpenter , Ray Massey , Robert Bassett and others
Defendant: Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Canty
as 1:2016cv06671
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Anthony Canty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Canty v. Bowers et al
as 3:2014cv00666
Plaintiff: Raymond Canty
Defendant: Keith Bowers, Damon Pipkens, Village of Cahokia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canty v. Ebbert
as 1:2013cv06950
Petitioner: Anthony Canty
Respondent: David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Canty v. Daniels et al
as 1:2013cv02828
Petitioner: Anthony Canty
Respondent: C. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Schuetz et al v. Burrelsman et al
as 3:2013cv00098
Plaintiff: Erik Schuetz , Florence Thompson and Cerebral Palsy of Southwestern Illinois
Defendant: Betty Burrelsman , Bruce Canty , Don Chrismore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?