Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 52
S2 Growth I LLC v. Romulus Capital Management, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10398
Plaintiff: S2 Growth I LLC
Defendant: Romulus Capital Management, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth III LP, Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Republic Maximal LLC et al v. Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv10429
Plaintiff: Republic Maximal LLC, Republic Master Fund, LP, EquipmentShare Growth One, LP and others
Defendant: Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth LP, Athena 2, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Republic Maximal LLC et al v. Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv10425
Plaintiff: Republic Maximal LLC, Republic Master Fund, LP, EquipmentShare Growth One, LP and others
Defendant: Romulus Capital Partners II, LLC, Romulus EquipmentShare Growth LP, Athena 2, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Berlik et al v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv11723
Plaintiff: Sacha Berlik, Berit Block, Paul Dean and others
Defendant: Michael Baker, Edward Crawley, Jeffrey Bussgang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Northeast Patients Group, et al v. Figueroa
as 21-1759
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST PATIENTS GROUP, d/b/a Wellness Connection of Maine and HIGH STREET CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: KIRSTEN FIGUEROA, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Administrative and Financial Services
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES and UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS OF MAINE
Northeast Patients Group, et al v. United Cannabis Patients and Caregivers of Maine
as 21-1719
Plaintiff / Appellee: NORTHEAST PATIENTS GROUP, d/b/a Wellness Connection of Maine and HIGH STREET CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES and KIRSTEN FIGUEROA, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Maine Department of Administrative and Financial Services
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS OF MAINE
NORTHEAST PATIENTS GROUP et al v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00468
Plaintiff: NORTHEAST PATIENTS GROUP doing business as WELLNESS CONNECTION OF MAINE and HIGH STREET CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
Defendant: MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES and KRISTINE FIGUEROA
Intervenor: UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS AND CAREGIVERS OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
NPG LLC et al v. CITY OF PORTLAND MAINE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00208
Defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND MAINE
Plaintiff: HIGH STREET CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC and NPG LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEC v. Hamburger
as 19-2043
Defendant: Z. PAUL JURBUERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc., JONATHAN MORRONE, individually and, d/b/a JM International, Inc., MAY'S INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
3Rd Party Defendant: ONEIGHTY C TECHNOLOGIES and DAVID SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: BRETT HAMBURGER, d/b/a JCBH Consulting, LLC
SEC v. Jurberg
as 19-2007
Defendant: ANTHONY ORTH, individually and, d/b/a Grand Traverse Equities, Inc., JONATHAN MORRONE, individually and, d/b/a JM International, Inc., MAY'S INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
3Rd Party Defendant: ONEIGHTY C TECHNOLOGIES and DAVID SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee: US SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: Z. PAUL JURBUERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc. and Z. PAUL JURBERG, individually and, d/b/a Brookline Capital Partners, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?