Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rigby v. Capitol One Financial Corporation
as 3:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Ardra Kenneth Rigby, Jr.
Defendant:
Capitol One Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Packett v. Capitol One Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00404
Defendant:
Capitol One Services, LLC, Capitol One Financial Corporation and Capitol One, National Association
Plaintiff:
Kathy Packett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv04303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stephens v. Capitol One Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv00193
Defendant:
Capitol One Financial Corporation and Richard D. Fairbank
Plaintiff:
John K. Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wadhwa, et al v. Aurora Loan Services LLC, et al
as 2:2011cv01784
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services, LLC , Capitol One Financial Corporation and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sunil Wadhwa and Lynn Lori Wadhwa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Bonham v. USDC-AZP
as 11-70672
:
In re: JAMES WILL BONHAM
Petitioner:
JAMES WILL BONHAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TERRY L. GODDARD, named as Terry Goddard/ Attorney General of the State of Arizona, JANICE K. BREWER, named as Jan Brewer/ Governor of the State of Arizona and others
James Bonham v. State of Arizona, et al
as 11-15541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILL BONHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TERRY L. GODDARD, named as Terry Goddard/ Attorney General of the State of Arizona, JANICE K. BREWER, named as Jan Brewer/ Governor of the State of Arizona and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
