Cases 1 - 10 of 39
CAPPS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv02459
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DEAN CAPPS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STEVEN MNUNCHIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHENEMAN v. BROOK et al
as 1:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHENEMAN
Defendant:
BARBARA BROOK, JESSE BARRETT, DAVID CAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHENEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv02165
Plaintiff:
JEREMIE SHENEMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JON E. DEGUILIO, DAVID CAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WADE v. MILLER et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Plaintiff:
E K WADE
Defendant:
JEFF MILLER, GARY ACKERMAN, SANDY ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
FLYNN et al v. DOOLEY & KRETSCHMAN, INC.
as 1:2008cv00858
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
DOOLEY & KRETSCHMAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FLYNN et al v. RENO CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC
as 1:2008cv00781
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
RENO CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FLYNN et al v. WATERBURY MASONRY & FOUNDATION, INC.
as 1:2008cv00752
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
WATERBURY MASONRY & FOUNDATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FLYNN et al v. ELEGANTE CERAMIC TILE & MARBLE INSTALLATION, INC.
as 1:2008cv00611
Plaintiff:
JOHN FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
ELEGANTE CERAMIC TILE & MARBLE INSTALLATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FLYNN et al v. BIERCH et al
as 1:2008cv00588
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. FLYNN, JAMES BOLAND, GERALD O'MALLEY and others
Defendant:
JOHN DANIEL BERICH and TODD BERICH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
