Cases 51 - 60 of 212
Jones v. Garman et al
as 1:2021cv01715
Plaintiff:
Sadeen Jones
Defendant:
Mark C. Garman, Captain Vangorder, Lt. Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv01647
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riley
Defendant:
George Miller, James J. Cirellli, Joseph Grillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ST. CHARLES v. AMRHEIN et al
as 2:2021cv01133
Plaintiff:
ALLEN L. ST. CHARLES
Defendant:
AMRHEIN, ZELAPOS, T. LANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Saleem v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2021cv01413
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sohail Saleem
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections, C.O. 1 Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. Simington et al
as 1:2021cv01347
Plaintiff:
Luis Martinez
Defendant:
Robert Simington, Lt. Kenneth Boal, Captain Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2021cv01069
Plaintiff:
Paris L. James
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Lt. Belles, John Doe Security Captain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Schickvam et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Defendant:
D. Drum, Dr. Chuma, Powers and others
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. COPELIC et al
as 3:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JONES and ROBERT MILLER
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, C/O BENDICK, C/O MCGOUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Maye v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
John Doe Defendants in Security at SCI Dallas, Captain Myer, Lieutenant Stark and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Anthony Maye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
