Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BOYCE v. KARCH et al
as 1:2023cv21019
Plaintiff:
JAY ROMAIN BOYCE
Defendant:
OFFICER R. KARCH, JOHN DOE, CHERRY HILL POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEILIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
MORGAN NEILIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, KAREN TAYLOR, CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sowell et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2023cv03532
Plaintiff:
Male Randy Sowell and D.D.S.S.
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS Anthony J. Annucci, NYDC Commissioner Cynthia Brann, PHIL MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2022cv05301
Plaintiff:
LOGAN CLIFF WILLIAMS
Defendant:
WARDEN TAYLOR, CAPTAIN STALLINGS, CAPTAIN LEEHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILCOX v. CUMBERLAND CO. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2022cv04672
Plaintiff:
PERRY A. WILCOX
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND CO. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, EUGENE J. CALDWELL, II, CAPTAIN BRAGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PELLECCHIA v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2022cv04707
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS D. PELLECCHIA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON, MS. FELICIA HOPSON, C.F.G. HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv09897
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAPTAIN J. MILLER, MOHAMED MOAHAREK and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLEIN et al v. O'NEILL et al
as 3:2014cv03361
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KLEIN and EMILY-JO KLEIN
Defendant:
CHARLES O'NEILL , THOMAS KELLY , CHIEF - GARY HOATS and others
Cross_claimant:
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Cross_defendant:
CITY OF SOMERVILLE, COUNTY OF SOMERSET , CHIEF - GARY HOATS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
