Cases 1 - 10 of 1,414
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Sierra v. Moreno, et al.
as 24-2672
Plaintiff:
JORGE R. SIERRA
Defendant:
SIS Officer MORENO, Captain J. CERONE, Warden JACQUEZ and others
Rosa v. Cook
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER ROSA
Defendant:
STEDMAN, Nurse, KATHRYN CARHART, Nurse, RALPH, Nurse and others
Bernardino v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2536
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO BERNARDINO, JR.
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR RALPH DIAZ, Warden TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS, (Captain) and others
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
Tripathy v. Lockwood
as 24-837
Plaintiff:
SANJAY TRIPATHY, -
Defendant:
Captain LOCKWOOD, Reverand HARRIS, SORC R. HOFFMAN, IGRC Chairperson and others
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Jace v. Lirones, et al.
as 24-1742
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACE
Defendant:
MARGARET LIRONES, Senior Librarian at CSP-Corcoran, KEN CLARK, Warden at CSP-Corcoran and A. PETERSON, Captain 4B Yard at CSP-Corcoran
Spence v. Lower Buckeye Jail, et al.
as 24-1630
Defendant:
PAUL PENZONE, Maricopa County Sheriff, LOWER BUCKEYE JAIL, MCSO Facility, Paul Pensone and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER A SPENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
