Cases 71 - 80 of 194
CONYERS v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CONYERS
Defendant:
WARDEN TRACY JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN DEXTER SPIKES, DEPUTY WARDEN MICHAEL THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEAY et al v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00150
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO DEMOND SEAY, GARLAN RICHARDSON, DEMOND BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL, CHIEF OSTRANDER, CAPTAIN JEROMMA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. KING et al
as 5:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Defendant:
Captain BUSTER KING, LIEUTENANT ENRIQUE MARCUS, NURSE TINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAVANAH et al v. CHATMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00262
Plaintiff:
PERRY B CAVANAH, STEVEN L EADS, LEWIS M CLARK and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF RICHARD CHATMAN, CAPTAIN BUSTER KING, LEUTINENT ENRIQUE MARCUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. CHAPMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00245
Plaintiff:
ERIC MATTHEW NEGRIN
Defendant:
RICHARD CHAPMAN, CAPTAIN BUSTER KING and NURSE TINA DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES V. THOMAS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 7:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
CEDRIC JONES
Defendant:
THOMAS COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Sheriff CARLTON POWELL, Lt VIRGINIA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COWART v. PAULK et al
as 7:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JULIUS COWART
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Captain JASON CLIFTON, Staff Sergeant SWAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORWOOD v. DILLS et al
as 1:2021cv00114
Defendant:
WARDEN ALLEN DILLS, CAPTAIN ROBERTS and MRS D W BROWN
Plaintiff:
DOYLE ANTHONY NORWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DORSEY v. CLAY
as 3:2021cv00078
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN CLAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. WHITTINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv00183
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITTINGTON, OFFICER TURNER, OFFICER DEESE and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
