Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc. v. City of Port Aransas et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Choke Canyon Motel, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Port Aransas, David Parsons, Adams . Rick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
A.I.I.L. et al v. Sessions et al
as 4:2023cv01383
Plaintiff:
A.I.I.L., L.L.H.O., J.L.V.A. and others
Defendant:
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions, III, Gene Hamilton, John F Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Martinez v. Nueces County et al
as 2:2021cv00210
Plaintiff:
George Martinez
Defendant:
Nueces County, Texas, Well Path, L.L.C., Fernando Carreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batiste v. Armaund et al
as 4:2020cv01092
Defendant:
Harris County, Jerry Sethna, Carla Armaund and others
Plaintiff:
Jerlene Batiste
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. U.S. Border Patrol et al
as 4:2019cv01650
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protections, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Border Patrol and others
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SAMAKE et al v. WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
as 4:2013cv01625
Plaintiff:
KATRISE SAMAKE , CARLA MARSHALL and VANESSA L JOHNSON
Defendant:
WEATHERFORD U.S., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Davis v. Hidalgo County, Texas
as 7:2012cv00502
Plaintiff:
Carla Davis
Defendant:
Hidalgo County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
