Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Jones v. Joyner et al
as 4:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Curtis Deon Jones
Defendant:
Sam A Joyner, Terence Kern, Allen Litchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickenson v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp et al
as 5:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
Carla J Dickenson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Eaton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Frances Eaton , Lee Stephens , Marvin Bone and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Bayer Corporation , McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Barnes , Terri Morris , Syrita Bowen and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Daniel Holtzclaw, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Matthews v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2015cv00571
Plaintiff:
Carla S Matthews
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson et al v. Things Remembered Inc et al
as 5:2015cv01013
Plaintiff:
Steve Wilson and Carla Wilson
Defendant:
Things Remembered Inc and G4 Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lane et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 4:2015cv00524
Plaintiff:
Stephen D Lane and Rachel L Lane
Defendant:
BP p.l.c. , Marathon Oil Corporation , Marathon Petroleum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gaddy-Eschbach v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2014cv00725
Plaintiff:
Carla L Gaddy-Eschbach
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Franklin v. Mohan et al
as 5:2014cv01277
Plaintiff:
Shawnttis Franklin
Defendant:
Ricky Mohan and Carla King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
