Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Boggs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00121
Defendant:
Navistar Inc., Gardner Denver, Inc., Meritor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Raegena Boggs and Paul Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Puffinberger et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Navistar Inc., Utility Trailer Manufacturing Company, Sundyne Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert "John" Puffinberger and Francis Puffinberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Carlisle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
Ann E Carlisle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12716
Plaintiff:
Mary Carlisle and Steven Carlisle
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jo Anne Carlisle
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yuille-Carlisle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24321
Plaintiff:
Maxine Yuille-Carlisle
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv24033
Plaintiff:
Cathy Carlisle and Jeffery Carlisle
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv20946
Plaintiff:
Judy Lynn Carlisle and Jeff Carlisle
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlisle v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv17317
Plaintiff:
Mary-Kathryn Carlisle
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnes et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv13537
Plaintiff:
Tina Barnes , Shirley Pulda , Katherine Nelson and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
