Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Washington v. Bi-State Correctional Center
as 5:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carlisle Washington
Defendant:
Bi-State Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beason v. Brown County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Beason
Defendant:
Brown County Sheriff's Department, Carlisle Gover, FNU Benefeild and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlisle v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00076
Petitioner:
David Wayne Carlisle
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carlisle v. Harris County Sheriff's Office Jail et al
as 4:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Montgomery County Sheriff, Dr Alsaida, Director Medical Katherine and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carlisle, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Harris County Sheriff's Office
as 4:2020cv00097
Defendant:
Harris County and Harris County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Carlisle, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Brown County Jail
as 6:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Jeffery Carlisle
Defendant:
Brown County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berigan et al v. Harris County
as 4:2015cv00986
Plaintiff:
Brian P Berigan, Glen Carlisle, Aaron Sloan and others
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wingfield v. Director of TDCJ et al
as 1:2014cv00182
Plaintiff:
Anthony B Wingfield
Defendant:
Director of TDCJ, FNU Carlisle and Unknown Female Occupant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlisle v. Dunn
as 6:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
William Jeffrey Carlisle
Respondent:
Clifford Dunn, Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townley v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
Brent J Townley
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Harley Lappin, Charles E Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
