Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Johnson et al v. Carlisle, LLC
as 2:2022cv02856
Plaintiff:
Ronesha Johnson, Sherica D. Jones and Alexis Johnson
Defendant:
Carlisle, LLC d/b/a Wendy's Restaurants
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acklin et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Paige Acklin , Steve Acuff , Michael L. Adkison and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Burrell v. Carlisle et al
as 2:2017cv02290
Plaintiff:
Thomas Burrell
Defendant:
Wayne Carlisle , Carlisle Farms , Bill Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
China Export & Credit Corporation v. Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Defendant:
Carlisle Transportation Products, Inc. , Carlisle Companies, Inc. , Carlisle Fluid Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aladdin Temp-Rite, LLC v. Carlisle Foodservice Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00650
Plaintiff:
Aladdin Temp-Rite, LLC
Defendant:
Carlisle Foodservice Products, Inc. and Dinex International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0101 Patent Infringement
Carlisle v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dawanell Carlisle
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Carlisle v. Andrews
as 1:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dawanell Carlisle
Defendant:
Emma Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Carlisle v. Winona Health Services
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
Saune-Elisabet C Carlisle
Defendant:
Winona Health Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
