Cases 1 - 9 of 9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.221 ACRE OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Herminia R. Contreras, Anthony L. Lovato, Jr., Arturo Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
FILING ERROR
as 1:2019cv00782
Defendant:
Edwin Reyes, Chameleon Landscaping and Irrigation, Inc., SLR Labor Works, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bertha Alicia Fernandez-Lopez, Carlos Alfredo Ramirez-Fernandez and Jesus Lamberto Ramirez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Fernandez-Lopez et al v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Edwin Reyes, Chameleon Landscaping and Irrigation, Inc., SLR Labor Works, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bertha Alicia Fernandez-Lopez, Carlos Alfredo Ramirez-Fernandez and Jesus Lamberto Ramirez-Lopez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Ramirez v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00530
Plaintiff:
Carlos David Ramirez
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ramirez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization of Aliens
as 5:2015cv00576
Petitioner:
Carlos Jesus Ramirez
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Naturalization of Aliens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alvera-Ramirez v. USA
as 4:2013cv00032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Alvera-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Herrera-Ramirez et al v. Techcrete Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00182
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Castillo-Garcia, Carlos Herrera-Ramirez and Ricardo Martinez-Romero
Defendant:
Jeffrey Goss, Todd Niccum and Techcrete Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramirez v. USA
as 4:2008cv00167
Petitioner:
Carlos Francisco Ramirez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramirez v. USA
as 1:2007cv00107
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Gutierrez Ramirez
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
