Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ataroua v. Tamir et al
as 1:2022cv10371
Plaintiff:
Islam Ataroua
Defendant:
Zaki Isaac B. Tamir, Tamir Law Group PC, Scott M. Stringer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leibovitz v. The City of New York
as 17-1939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Etan Leibovitz
Defendant - Appellee:
Warden Carlton Newton, Warden Antonio G. Cuin, Captains Perry, Shield #480 and others
Estevez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Juan Estevez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joseph Ponte, Carlton Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leibovitz v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00546
Plaintiff:
Etan Leibovitz
Defendant:
The City of New York, Carlton Newton, Antonio Cuin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aponte v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03989
Plaintiff:
Felix Aponte
Defendant:
City of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Ada Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Schriro et al
as 1:2014cv02670
Defendant:
Boyd, Mr. Brown, Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Schriro
as 14-98
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre A. Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Dora Schriro, Commissioner of New York CIty Department of Corrections, Carlton Newton, Warden of North Facility, O.B.C.C., Warden Ramos, Dept. of Security of North Facility, O.B.C.C. and others
Daniels v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06286
Plaintiff:
John Daniels
Defendant:
City of New York , New York City Department of Correction (DOC) , Carlton Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teron v. New York City
as 13-505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jay Jay Teron
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City, Judge Moore, Department of Corrections and others
Baker v. Walsh et al
as 1:2012cv05337
Petitioner:
Ralph Baker
Respondent:
Carlton Newton and Hon. John C. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
