Cases 41 - 50 of 52
HURST v. Thomas County Jail et al
as 7:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
GREG DEWAYNE HURST
Defendant:
Thomas County Jail, R. Carlton Powell, DEBRA QUICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lin Davis, Sr. v. Sheriff Carlton Powell, et al
as 12-16387
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLTON POWELL, Sheriff, JAMES, Captain, TOBY KNIGHTFER, Det. and others
Davis v. Powell et al
as 7:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, SR
Defendant:
Carlton Powell, JAMES, TOBY KNIGHTFER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chauncey Davis v. Carlton Powell, et al
as 11-14559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CARLTON POWELL, VIRGINIA WILLIAMS, SGT. HAYWOOD and others
Williams v. Powell
as 7:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
ELBERT LEE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
Carlton Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Powell et al
as 7:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Chauncey Davis
Defendant:
Carlton Powell, Virginia Williams, Sgt. Haywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Thomas County Jail et al
as 7:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Aaron Joseph Lee
Defendant:
Thomas County Jail, Virginia Williams, John Richards and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren v. Powell et al
as 7:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
Mallory Warren
Defendant:
Carlton Powell, Officer Player, Virginia Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heard v. Hunt et al
as 1:2007cv03209
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Heard
Defendant:
Garland R. Hunt, L. Gale Buckner, Garfield Hammons, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copeland v. Powell et al
as 7:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Marlon Copeland
Defendant:
Carlton Powell, Virginia Williams, John Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
