Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hampton v. Medicredit Inc.
as 8:2017cv01350
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hampton
Defendant:
Medicredit Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
WEST et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05828
Plaintiff:
JOANNE WEST , BRENDA A WHITE , FEDORA WHITLEY and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARVIZU et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05820
Plaintiff:
MARGARET ARVIZU , FREDDIE CASTEEL , JIM CASTEEL and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03109
Plaintiff:
JoAnne West , Brenda A. White , Fedora Whitley and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
West et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03109
Plaintiff:
JoAnne West , Brenda A. White , Fedora Whitley and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Arvizu et al v. McKesson Corporation
as 3:2013cv03064
Plaintiff:
Margaret Arvizu , Freddie Casteel , Jim Casteel and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Arvizu et al v. McKesson Corporation
as CAN/3:13-cv-03064
Plaintiff:
Margaret Arvizu , Freddie Casteel , Jim Casteel and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv13318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Barrett v. Detroit Heading LLC, et al
as 07-1792
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DONALD L. BARRETT
Defendant - Appellant:
DETROIT HEADING, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company
Defendant:
CAROLYN HAMPTON, individually
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
