Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Carr v. ACI, LLC
as 2:2010cv00422
Plaintiff:
Lillian Carr
Defendant:
ACI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kaye Seamster Carr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Carr et al v. Fidelis Recovery Solutions, Incorporated
as 3:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Vickie Carr and Michael J. Kuver
Defendant:
Fidelis Recovery Solutions, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00188
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vanover et al v. Shams et al
as 1:2008cv01037
Plaintiff:
Jilla N. Vanover and Angeltouch Home Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Alan Shams, Cynthia Shams, Charles Swedish and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Doe I et al v. pauliewalnuts et al
as 5:2008mc00001
Plaintiff:
Doe I and Doe II
Defendant:
pauliewalnuts, neoprag, STANFORDtroll and others
Movant:
AOL, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
