Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Carr v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2020cv01194
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon Incorporated and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Frances Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03659
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jamie Shardae Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04269
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04141
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Yvette Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv01719
Plaintiff:
Clyde Carr
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00833
Plaintiff:
Virginia Carr
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03957
Plaintiff:
Denis Carr
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03714
Plaintiff:
Robert A Carr
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johns-Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03699
Plaintiff:
Linda A Johns-Carr
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03707
Plaintiff:
Elanora Carr
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
