Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Turner v. Casey et al
as 1:2013cv01409
Defendant:
Alexander Casey and John and Jane Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
John G. Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farakhan et al v. Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority et al
as 5:2013cv00428
Defendant:
Akron Metropolitan Housing Authority , James D Casey and Kristy Rider
Plaintiff:
Khadijah R. Farakhan , Yolanda Hayward , Lawanda Moorer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conley v. Sims et al
as 1:2012cv00682
Plaintiff:
Casey Conley
Defendant:
Tyrone Sims, Kenneth Cheek and New Miami, Ohio Village of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welsh et al v. Schnarrs et al
as 4:2011cv01580
Plaintiff:
Michael Welsh , Tyler Welsh , Casey Welsh and others
Defendant:
Ron Schnarrs , Timothy O'Leary , Scott Strain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wiltz v. State of New Jersey et al
as 2:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
Cassandra R Wiltz
Defendant:
State of New Jersey, Somerset County Superior Court, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. City of Maple Heights et al
as 1:2008cv02374
Plaintiff:
Abram Williams and Abram Williams
Defendant:
City of Maple Heights, Alexander Casey, Mark Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
