Cases 1 - 10 of 17
COSTIN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv02484
Plaintiff:
GREGG COSTIN, DANIEL SCHULTZ, CASSIDY HOLLOWELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, LLOYD AUSTIN and LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2020cv02710
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
Amicus Curiae:
KEVIN CRAMER, RAND PAUL, CINDY HYDE-SMITH and others
Interested Party:
USA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ v. ALFAISAL et al
as 1:2020cv00089
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, RICK SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CORTEZ v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2019cv03847
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, MARYPAT WRIGHT, TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Johnson v. Chittenden County State Attor, et al
as 19-5329
Defendant / Appellee:
Norman R. Bezio, Director of SHU, Brian Fischer, NYS DOCCS Chief, J. Facteau, Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
CUNNINGHAM v. CASSIDY
as 1:2019cv03385
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM T CUNNINGHAM and WILLIAM T. CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
JEREMIAH CASSIDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
JOHNSON v. CHITTENDEN COUNTY STATE ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 1:2019cv03076
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, NEW YORK STATE, STACY L. GRACZYK and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ v. SULTAN AL HITHALAYN et al
as 1:2019cv01642
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, RICK SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTEZ v. WRIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv01641
Defendant:
MARYPAT WRIGHT, SARA ALMALIK, CASSIDY SOVA and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
