Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv17121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv12195
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV , Debra Dave, Dwight A. Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cate v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv08466
Plaintiff:
Jack N. Cate
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilbert v. Cates et al
as 2:2017cv04786
Plaintiff:
Dean E. Gilbert
Defendant:
Sidney H Cates, IV, Baldwin, Haspel, Burke & Mayer, LLC, Thomas J. Cortazzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 2:2017mc00066
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cates Brooks
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Brooks v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00066
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cates Brooks
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Cormier et al v. Soroa et al
as 6:2016cv01438
Defendant:
Ubaldo Soroa, Hawk Logistics, S O L Express Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Christine Cormier and Byron Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hooks v. Cates et al
as 2:2014cv01446
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Hooks
Defendant:
Sidney H. Cates , Jason Giles and Rachel A. Meese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. Mescherskaya et al
as 2:2014cv00729
Plaintiff:
Robin Cates
Defendant:
Olga Mescherskaya and Progressive West Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bedford et al v. BP p.l.c. et al
as 2:2012cv00730
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bedford , Arnold A. Acosta , Henry E. Adams and others
Defendant:
BP p.l.c., BP Exploration and Production, Inc, BP America Production Company and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
