Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. M/V Spirit of Two Thousand & Ten et al
as 2:2013cv07384
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and M/V Spirit of Two Thousand & Ten
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Martin Tutschek, Forum National Investments Ltd. and Daniel Clozza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mitsubishi v. C Richard Cowan, et al
as 8:2001cv00815
Counter Defendant:
Marina Contractors Inc, Marina Landscape Inc, Marina Investment Group Inc and others
Defendant:
C Richard Cowan, Ziba Cowan, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mitsubishi Caterpillar Forklift America Inc
Receiver:
Robb Evans
Special Master:
Hon. (Ret.) James W Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. M/V Spirit of Two Thousand & Ten, Number 806696 et al
as 3:2013cv02391
Defendant:
M/V Spirit of Two Thousand & Ten, Number 806696 and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. M/V Spirit of Two Thousand & Ten
as 4:2013cv04618
Defendant:
M/V Spirit of Two Thousand & Ten
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
as 3:2009cv02867
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation v. Charter Connection Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00767
Defendant:
Belle Amie ON 1170780, Pamela Terrebonne, Charter Connection Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
Intervenor Plaintiff:
A.K. Suda, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
