Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sanchez-Wright et al v. Caterpillar Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Victoria Sanchez-Wright and Dominque Wright
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc. and Vulcan Materials Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lucero et al v. Caterpillar Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00207
Defendant:
GKN Armstrong Wheels, Inc., Caterpillar Inc., GKN North American Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lucero and Whitnie Potts
Interpleader:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hanover Insurance Company v. Wirtgen, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00176
Defendant:
Wirtgen GmbH, Kirby-Smith Machinery, Inc., Caterpillar Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hanover Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castleberry v. Motor Home Specialist L.P. et al
as 3:2012cv02554
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc, Motor Home Specialist Management LLC, Protective Administrative Services Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Gary G Castleberry
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
3Rd Party Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
S.S. v. Caterpillar, Inc
as 4:2009cv00143
Plaintiff:
Sammy L Shipley and S.S.
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
One Beacon Insurance Company et al v. Caterpillar, Inc
as 2:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
One Beacon Lloyd's, Inc, CU Lloyd's of Texas, Inc and One Beacon Insurance Company
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Caterpillar Inc
as 4:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
Travelers Property Casualty of America
Defendant:
Caterpillar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
