Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Great American Insurance Company et al v. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha et al
as 3:2016cv02919
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company and Great American Insurance Company of New York
Defendant:
Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha and Oakwood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06621
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06603
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06442
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06441
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06184
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06098
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Twin City Fire Insurance Co et al v. American Home Assurance et al
as 3:2007cv01583
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Co and First State Ins Co
Defendant:
American Home Assurance, United States Fire Ins Co, International Ins Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. v. CENTRAL NATL INS., et al
as 2:2000cv04763
Defendant:
CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. OF OMAHA, FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Respondent:
CRAVENS, DRAGAN CO, PACIFIC COAST, As Managing General Agent of CENTRAL NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF OMAHA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
