Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. 00001SIM-220 et al v. Imperial Crane Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01037
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. 00001SIM-220, Chaucer Syndicate 1084 and Beazley Syndicate 3623
Defendant: Imperial Crane Services, Inc. and Bohne Crane Rental & Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. SFV Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02278
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant: SFV Logistics LLC, Maruichi Leavitt Pipe & Tube LLC, Michael A Bartkus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Who Subscribe to Certificate No IRPI-AML-22-055 v. Cater Transport Services, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00310
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Who Subscribe to Certificate No IRPI-AML-22-055
Defendant: Cater Transport Services, LLC, Cater Transport, LLC, Cater Transportation Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 50017200120 v. Stonegate Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv01908
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 50017200120
Defendant: Stonegate Insurance Company, Producer's National Corporation, Q West d/b/a Q Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Wabash National Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
as 4:2022cv00023
Plaintiff: Wabash National Corporation
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Type: Contract Insurance
Labrenz v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01793
Counter Defendant: Trent Labrenz
Plaintiff: Mr Trent Labrenz
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987, Dennis Jones dba Eagle Window & Siding, Eagle Window & Siding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987 v. Dennis Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01217
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. BRT3A002360-02, Lloyd's Syndicate 2987
Defendant: Dennis Jones dba Eagle Window & Siding, Jacob M. Sitze, Trent Labrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Certificate No. B0621PALIN00217 v. Alin Machining Co., Inc.
as 1:2021cv04245
Plaintiff: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. B0621PALIN00217
Defendant: Alin Machining Co., Inc. d/b/a Power Plant Services and Alin Machining Co., Inc. doing business as Power Plant Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
WINSIGHT LLC v. Swiss Re International SE et al
as 1:2021cv01602
Defendant: Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's London and Swiss Re International SE
Plaintiff: WINSIGHT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Policy No. HAI-0901809 Known as Syndicates 2987 BRT, 457 Mun Re and 1183 TAL
as 1:2021cv01394
Plaintiff: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Defendant: Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Severally Subscribing to Policy No. HAI-0901809 Known as Syndicates 2987 BRT, 457 Mun Re and 1183 TAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?