Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CONTRERAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19343
Plaintiff:
CESAR CONTRERAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cesar Contreras Armas v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 23-15438
Petitioner / Appellant:
CESAR CONTRERAS ARMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Contreras-Orosco v. USA
as 3:2023cv00186
Petitioner:
Cesar Contreras-Orosco
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
CHAND et al v. MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY
as 1:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
SALLY CHAND, MICHAEL CHAND, JR., CHRISTINA MAHON and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
CONTRERAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60047
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CESAR CONTRERAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Cesar Contreras-Orosco
as 19-10193
Defendant / Appellant:
CESAR CONTRERAS-OROSCO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Armas v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00387
Respondent:
R. Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Cesar Contreras Armas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Contreras-Munoz v. Warden
as 3:2018cv00485
Petitioner:
Cesar Contreras-Munoz
Respondent:
Warden
Miscellaneous_party:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brigida et al v. Valk et al
as 3:2018cv01443
Plaintiff:
Sean VB Brigida , TeShaun J Allen , Juan Arismendez and others
Defendant:
Ronald C Valk , Robert Shawn Valk and LIV Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
