Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00870
Defendant:
Dr. G.C.D. Rose, The Health Care Provider and Medicaid, Dr. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv02145
Plaintiff:
Richie Leo Williams
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. King et al
as 1:2024cv02113
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, Amber Stanley King and Chadwick S. Dotson
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sturdivant v. Doston
as 2:2024cv00671
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sturdivant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv02001
Plaintiff:
Terrence Wells
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Unknown Six et al
as 7:2024cv00737
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge State Prison, Unknown Six and Chadwick S. Dotson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00719
Defendant:
Sgt. McCoy, Chadwick S. Dotson, Lt. Kimberline and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Shannon Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinchee v. Reed et al
as 7:2024cv00721
Defendant:
Warden Melvin C. Davis, S. Ruiz, Sgt. [UNK] Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Edward Hinchee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2024cv01800
Defendant:
Julie Lillrose Churchill, Detective Patrick Graham, Kathryn Eleneor Lavelle and others
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Dotson et al
as 1:2024cv01801
Defendant:
Chadwick S. Dotson and David E. Anderson
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
