Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Cioppa et al
as 1:2023cv01834
Plaintiff:
Chai Chen
Defendant:
District Director Thomas Cioppa, USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Farag v. XYZ Two Way Radio Service, Inc.
as 22-1795
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdelhamid, Pierre Mankit Chan, Si Chai Chen and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ahmed Farag
Defendant / Appellee:
XYZ Two Way Radio Service, Inc., Mohamed Mowad, Sandy Check and others
Farag et al v. XYZ Two Way Radio Service Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04191
Defendant:
Shengwei Zhang, Jerry Ching Hor, XYZ Two Way Radio Service Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hei Ching Kwok, Mohamed Abdelhamid, Mohamed Abdelnaby and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03425
Husband:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wife:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Daughter:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv05775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chen v. Holder
as 12-4319
Petitioner:
Bao Chai Chen, AKA Hideo Sato
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Chai Chen v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60080
Petitioner:
CHAI CHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
