Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NATALIE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
CHAMBLISS NATALIE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCAL SECURITY
Other:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
THE VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
VARIABLE ANNUITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHAMBLISS R WIGGINS, CRAIG R WILSON and SATONYA G WIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
CHAMBLISS v. WALMART INC et al
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
JOEL CHAMBLISS
Defendant:
WALMART INC doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter #1153 and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP doing business as Wal-Mart Supercenter #1153
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CHAMBLISS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 5:2012cv00017
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D CHAMBLISS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Chambliss v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 5:2010cv00377
Plaintiff:
Anthony Chambliss
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00032
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chambliss v. USA
as 5:2008cv90034
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Petitioner:
Michael L. Chambliss
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Blount v. Ken's Laundry & Cleaners et al
as 5:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
Samuel A. Blount
Defendant:
Ken's Laundry & Cleaners and Ken Chambliss
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company v. City of Forsyth et al
as 5:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company and Argonaut Great Central Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Forsyth, Georgia, James E. Pace, Jr., Chris Hewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
