Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Amaze PBC v. Champion Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Amaze PBC
Defendant:
Champion Health, Inc. and Concierge Benefit Services LLC doing business as Concierge Third Party Administrators
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Muthle (PS) v. Modera River North
as 1:2023cv01686
Plaintiff:
Champion Muthle
Defendant:
Modera River North
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Muthle v. Hostel Fish, LLC
as 1:2023cv01088
Plaintiff:
Champion D. Muthle
Defendant:
Hostel Fish, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Champion v. Dillon Companies, LLC
as 1:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Dillon Companies, LLC, D and Dillon Companies, LLC doing business as King Soopers also known as D620 King Soopers
Plaintiff:
Charles Champion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jerding v. Champion Petfoods USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02756
Defendant:
Champion Petfoods USA, Inc. and Champion Petfoods LP
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jerding and Cammeo Renfro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Frictionless World, LLC v. Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03147
Plaintiff:
Frictionless World, LLC
Defendant:
Champion Power Equipment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Martinez v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv02386
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Marie Martinez
Defendant:
Charles Clark, Amanda Fearal-Scott and Mike Champion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abeyta et al v. CF&I Steel, L.P.
as 1:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Ralph Abeyta , Domingo Abraham , Martin Adakai and others
Defendant:
CF&I Steel, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
