Cases 21 - 30 of 54
HAMILTON v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2018cv01158
Defendant:
WENDY POHLHAUS, LESLIE PARSONS, CHANNING PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROSSMANN v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2018cv00025
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
DONALD JOHN TRUMP, NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ASHEESH AGARWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSSMANN v. PATTERSON et al
as 1:2017cv01688
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
ERIC PATTERSON, CHANNING PHILLIPS, JOHN DOE-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GRIMES v. MARTINEZ et al
as 1:2017cv01560
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
MARTINEZ, JIMMIE WILDER, EDWARD STERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMES v. CLEARLY-TROMBLY et al
as 1:2017cv01378
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
AMI CLEARLY-TROMBLY, PIK CHOI, CHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PILOT v. KOLLAR-KOTELLY et al
as 1:2017cv01337
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHARLES PILOT
Defendant:
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and CHANNING D. PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MONROE-RICKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
VICKY MONROE-RICKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROSEBAR et al v. HOGAN et al
as 1:2017cv00932
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE ROSEBAR, ERIN MICHELLE ROSEBAR and MILTON J. TAYLOR-EL
Defendant:
THOMAS F. HOGAN, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, JOHN P. MARSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
