Cases 1 - 10 of 11
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
JUDGE DEBORAH C BENEFIELD, ERMAN TANJUATCO, ROBERT BENTHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Chambers
as 3:2022cv00179
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Caldwell et al
as 3:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kenneth William Chandler
Defendant:
Warden Caldwell, Grier and Ms. McAfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. East Central Regional Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Dr. Sarita Sharma, East Central Regional Hospital and Dr. Ajai Kalla
Plaintiff:
Jordan Chandler Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THORNTON et al v. BENEFIELD et al
as 5:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON and RASHEKA LASHON CHANDLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, UNITED STATES, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Hall et al
as 5:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Nillius, Chandler, Guy Augustin and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Sebastian Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAXTON v. COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER SAXTON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and MURRAY GUNDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHONE v. MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 4:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES MAHONE
Defendant:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER, RYAN CHANDLER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Wiley et al
as 5:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
Emory Steven Chandler
Defendant:
Leroy S. Wiley and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Prison Health Services Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00239
Plaintiff:
John Eric Simmons
Defendant:
Prison Health Services Inc., Novack, R. L. Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
