Cases 1 - 10 of 73
WITMER et al v. NAZARIO et al
as 5:2020cv01247
Defendant:
JAMES H. COFIELD, NICHOLAS NAZARIO, JR., ABC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER POPE and HEIDI WITMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS V. UPMC
as 2:2019cv00865
Defendant:
UPMC MAGEE HOSPITAL/CLINIC, UPMC MAGEE HOSPITAL/CLINICS, EMILY REDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY L. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
EYAJAN v. NESCO RESOURCE LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00034
Defendant:
BILL KAYDO, RANDY EDWARDS, COMMUNITY HEALTH NET and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHANDLER-MILES v. GARBARINO
as 2:2018cv04003
Defendant:
CHARLES GARBARINO
Plaintiff:
KELLY CHANDLER-MILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BOBO et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03968
Plaintiff:
MADLYNE BOBO , EMA HERNANDEZ , RONALD HUGHES and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHANDLER v. L'OREAL USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01141
Plaintiff:
KIM E. CHANDLER
Defendant:
L'OREAL USA, INC. and SOFT SHEEN-CARSON LLC
Mediator:
GARY P. CARUSO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scholfield v. Chandler
as 1:2017cv00587
Plaintiff:
Genevieve Scholfield
Defendant:
Camelia Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COADY et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER COADY and ADELINE COADY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHANDLER et al v. ROELANDT et al
as 2:2013cv07334
Plaintiff:
FLORANCE CHANDLER and MARY WOODSON
Defendant:
JAMES PATRICK ROELANDT and BRADLEY ROELANDT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05862
Plaintiff:
HENRY ADAMS , NORMA ALDRIDGE , ELIZABETH ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
