Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Castaneda v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Castaneda
Defendant:
Galindo Adrian Pedro Rodriguez, Chantal Christine Castillo and 24-7 Carrier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Garcia v. Montford Unit et al
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Oscar N. Garcia
Defendant:
Montford Unit, David Reed, Chantal A. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Montford Unit et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Oscar Norman Garcia
Defendant:
Montford Unit, David Reed, J Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delk v. Perkins et al
as 1:2021cv00861
Plaintiff:
Darnell Delk
Defendant:
Robert Perkins, John Doe, Chantal Eldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Limon v. Lala Healthcare Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Majandra Limon
Defendant:
Chantal Torrain and Lala Healthcare Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Boulanger et al v. Arrow Midstream Holdings LLC et al
as 3:2015cv03032
Plaintiff:
Isabelle Boulanger , Rene Boutin , Sophie Boutin and others
Defendant:
Arrow Midstream Holdings LLC, Canadian Pacific Railway Company , ConocoPhillips Company and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Isabelle Boulanger, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wright v. Loper
as 3:2014cv02612
Plaintiff:
Wesley Wright
Defendant:
Chantal Loper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Carey et al v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
William Carey and Chantal Carey
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
