Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Chaplin v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
Charlene-Jannise Chaplin
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tr Fed. Question: Trademark
Chaplin v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
Charlene-Jannise Chaplin
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Gross Polowy-Ashley M. Pascuzzi, Homebridge Financial Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Liu v. Rajacic et al
as 1:2022cv00379
Defendant:
Michelle Rajacic, 142 east 33rd street realty Corp., Michele Chaplin and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, jane #1-10 does and Company ABC #1-10
Plaintiff:
daming liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 co Diversity-Conversion
Chaplin v. WeWork Management LLC
as 1:2021cv07746
Plaintiff:
Renee Chaplin
Defendant:
WeWork Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
Chaplin v, We Work Management, LLC
as 1:2021cv07748
Plaintiff:
Renee Chaplin
Defendant:
WeWork Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fm
Hudak v. HEXO Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv00196
Defendant:
HEXO Corp., Ed Chaplin, Michael Monahan and others
Plaintiff:
George Hudak
Petitioner:
John B. Medley, Steven Ceresa and Timothy Sweeney
Perez v. HEXO Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv10965
Defendant:
HEXO Corp., Ed Chaplin, Michael Monahan and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Perez
Chaplin's Barber Shop, LLC v. Chaplin Barbershop et al
as 1:2019cv05669
Defendant:
Chaplin Barbershop and Arthur Yusupov
Plaintiff:
Chaplin's Barber Shop, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1127 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
