Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Johnson v. Chappius
as 24-1225
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
Superintendent PAUL CHAPPIUS, Jr., GREGORY KELLER, Deputy Superintendent For Security, Lieutenant TIMOTHY CARROLL and others
Gunn v. Abrunzo
as 22-971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Gunn
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Bescler, Correction Officer, Jeffery Claflin, Sergeant, Timothy Perry, Correction Officer and others
Defendant:
William J. Abrunzo, Inmate Grievance Program, Supervisor, Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner, R.J. Ballard, Lieutenant and others
Barnes v. Fedele
as 22-35
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Arrello Barnes
Defendant / Appellee:
Fedele, Furman, Correction Officer Robert Murphy and others
Defendant:
M. McGinnis, Napoli, Everette and others
Krivoi v. Chappius
as 21-2934
Petitioner / Appellant:
Marat Krivoi
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul W. Chappius, Jr., Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
Delgado v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00120
Defendant:
Corrections Sergeant G. Hill, Mark . Taylor, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Chappius, Jr.
as 20-3914
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ukiah Atkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Paul J. Chappius, Jr., Superintendent
Christopher v. Chappius et al
as 6:2020cv06330
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Plaintiff:
Johnson Christopher and Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Chappius et al
as 1:2020cv00604
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Ramirez, Lt. Wolf, Sgt. Paciorek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delgado v. Annucci et al
as 6:2020cv06228
Defendant:
Corrections Sergeant G. Hill, Mark . Taylor, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Delgado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Chappius
as 19-3840
Petitioner:
Darrell Gunn
Respondent:
Paul J. Chappius, Jr., Superintendent, Elmira Correctional Facility
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
