Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Dishon v. Moore et al
as 6:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Nina Charlene Dishon
Defendant:
Justin Moore and AssuredPartners NL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hatfield et al v. M & M Imports, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv00055
Plaintiff:
Charlene Hatfield and Starlen Russell Hatfield
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation and M & M Imports, Inc. doing business as Walters Toyota Nissan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00253
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Stasiulis et al
as 5:2020cv00035
Defendant:
Charlene R. Stasiulis, Any Unknown Heirs and Spouses of Heirs of Deanna J. Bundalo, Charlene Renee Chavez and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Thomas et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Plaintiff:
Bradley Wood, Laura McDonough, Darrell Mitchell and others
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Baker v. Constitution State Services, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00166
Defendant:
Constitution State Services, LLC and Circle K Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charlene Vera Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gorrell et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 5:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Charlene Gorrell and Howard Gorrell
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cole v. Cars Direct, LLC
as 3:2017cv00336
Plaintiff:
Charlene Cole
Defendant:
Cars Direct, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Ramey v. SSA
as 7:2017cv00055
Plaintiff:
Charlene Sue Ramey
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
