Cases 1 - 10 of 18
BROOKS v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2017cv03715
Plaintiff:
CHARLES AARON BROOKS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE , MICHAEL STILES , TIMOTHY SUSANIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2017cv01313
Plaintiff:
Charles Aaron Brooks
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service , Michael Stiles , Timothy Susanin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brooks v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv03339
Plaintiff:
Charles L Brooks, III
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W BROOKS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROOKS v. AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv93833
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKSv. GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93787
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. H. B. FULLER COMPANY
as 2:2009cv93907
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
H. B. FULLER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93804
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv93868
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CONGOLEUM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BROOKS v. CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv92891
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROOKS
Defendant:
CERTAINTEED CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
