Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Murphy v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Murphy v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Douglas Murphy
Defendant:
Charles B. Smith, Nathan Nutting, Charles Frye and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles W. Smith v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Smith
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Keefe et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv01370
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Keefe, Ana Acevedo, Audrey Throckmorton and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Eddie J. Suber et al v. Michael Calhoun et al
as 2:2019cv06593
Plaintiff:
Norma J. Suber, Eddie J. Suber, Charles H. Smith and others
Defendant:
Michael Calhoun and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. David Grant Medical Center et al
as 3:2018cv04185
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
David Grant Medical Center and U.S. Department of the Air Force
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00856
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Smith et al v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 3:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Smith and Patricia R. Smith
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Foulk
as 2:2014cv00529
Petitioner:
Charles R. Smith
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Foulk
as 2:2013cv02387
Petitioner:
Charles R Smith
Respondent:
Fred Foulk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
