Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Smith-Bey v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01654
Petitioner:
Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent:
John Wolfe and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith-Bey v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv01336
Petitioner:
Charles A. Smith-Bey
Respondent:
John Wolfe, Amy J. Bragunier and Rex W. Coffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv01067
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith-Bey v. Warden John Wolfe et al
as 8:2015cv00764
Petitioner:
Charles Arnell Smith-Bey
Respondent:
Warden John Wolfe and The Attorney General of State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
City of Annapolis v. Bowen, Jr. et al
as 1:2014cv02558
Plaintiff:
City of Annapolis
Defendant:
Edgar A Bowen, Jr., Kenneth S Ashton, Gene Craig Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Green et al v. Hebron Savings Bank et al
as 1:2008cv03391
Plaintiff:
Joyce Green, Joyce Green, Sean C. Logan and others
Defendant:
Hebron Savings Bank, Dean E. French, Edward Wilgus and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Dinisio et al
as 8:2008cv02990
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Dinisio, State Of Maryland and Talbot County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv01487
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker v. Smith et al
as 8:2008cv00813
Plaintiff:
Law Office of Dobbs & Baker
Defendant:
Charles E. Smith, United States of America and Law Office of David M. Wasser
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones et al v. City of Frederick, Maryland et al
as 1:2007cv03010
Plaintiff:
James Jones, James Jones, James Jones and others
Defendant:
City of Frederick, Maryland, Frederick County, Maryland, Frederick City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
