Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Chandler v. Long Falls Paperboard, LLC
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Lone Falls Paperboard, LLC and Long Falls Paperboard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Chandler v. State of Vermont et al
as 5:2016cv00199
Petitioner:
Charles Chandler
Respondent:
State of Vermont and William Sorrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chandler v. Carroll et al
as 2:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Karen Carroll , Richard Carroll , David Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Denise Johnson, Marilyn Skoglund and Brian Burgess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Central Vermont Public Service Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00131
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, Lawrence Reilly, Scott Adnams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Carroll et al
as 2:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Karen Carroll , Richard Carroll and David A Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Branchaud et al
as 1:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Matthew Branchaud, Abatiell Associates, P.C., Eric Louttit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Suntag et al
as 1:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
David Suntag , Glen L. Yates , Andrew C. Boxer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Village of Newfane, Vermont et al
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Village of Newfane, Vermont, John Feifel, Gary Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. LaPorte et al
as 2:2009cv00063
Plaintiff:
Charles Chandler
Defendant:
Christopher Loyzelle, Kraig LaPorte and Vermont State Police
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
