Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Daniels v. Novant Health Inc et al
as 1:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr. and Clarence Daniels, Jr.
Defendant:
Novant Health Inc, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, The, Mecklenburg EMS Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daniels v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv01613
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Daniel v. Glebe
as 2:2016cv00440
Petitioner:
Charles Daniel, Jr.
Respondent:
Pat Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel v. Glebe
as 2:2016cv00241
Petitioner:
Charles Daniel, Jr.
Respondent:
Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniel v. Heise et al
as 2:2015cv01247
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniel, Jr.
Defendant:
David Heise , Ildiko Danko , Ina McNeese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Daniel, Jr. v. L'Menreux, et al
as 14-35189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DANIEL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
L'MENREUX, Classification Counselor, Stafford Creek Correctional Center, KHAMARI CLAGGIOAN, Counselor, Stafford Creek Correctional Center, MCELRAVY, CPM, Stafford Creek Correctional Center and others
Daniel v. L'Menreux et al
as 3:2013cv05502
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniel, Jr.
Defendant:
L'Menreux, Derek Wagner, Khamari Claggioan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels, Jr
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Charles Daniel, Jr. v. Todd Fredrickson, et al
as 13-35326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DANIEL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD FREDRICKSON, Sgt., BOB EDINGTON, Sgt., SGT. FULLER and others
Charles Daniel, Jr. v. Todd Fredrickson, et al
as 12-36059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES DANIEL, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD FREDRICKSON, Sgt., BOB EDINGTON, Sgt., SGT. FULLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
