Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Daniel Roger Hood v. Warden of the San Quentin State Prison in the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv03577
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roger Hood
Defendant:
Warden of the San Quentin State Prison in the State of California, Judge Blaine K. Bowman, District Attorney Keith Watanabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balwin Hills Investors Ltd. v. Charles Finley, Jr.
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Balwin Hills Investors Ltd. and Baldwin Hills Investors, LTD.
Defendant:
Charles Edward Finley, Jr. individually, and doing business as My Mailbox
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Charles Edward Baines v. Theresa Cisneros
as 2:2022cv05123
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Baines
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Edward Martin Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv02232
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Martin Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Charles Edward Anderson v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 5:2019cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Andrson, Jr.
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Charles Edward Allen v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2017cv09239
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Allen
Respondent:
W. L. Montgomery and People of the State of California
Charles Edward Ross v. Terri Gonzalez
as 5:2017cv01593
Respondent:
Terri Gonzalez
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Ross
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00528
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kemper Independence Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 8:2014cv01516
Defendant:
Does, Charles Edward Mullaly and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kemper Independence Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
