Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Charles N. Belssner v. Assurance Wireless Lifeline
as 5:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Belssner
Defendant:
Assurance Wireless Lifeline
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Charles N. Belssner v. City of Las Vegas Parking
as 2:2023cv08053
Petitioner:
Charles N. Blessner and Charles N. Belssner
Respondent:
City of Las Vegas Parking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Charles Belssner v. Circle Dental, et al
as 20-55708
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RANDALL D. WHITE, Honorable, CIRCLE DENTAL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES N. BELSSNER and CHARLES BELSSNER
Charles N. Belssner v. Jessup Auto Plaza et al
as 5:2020cv01378
Defendant:
Honorable Randall D. White, State of California, California Commission on Judicial Discipline and others
Plaintiff:
Charles N Belssner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Charles N Belssner v. Circle Dental et al
as 5:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Circle Dental, State of California, Honorable Randall D. White and others
Plaintiff:
Charles N Belssner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Belssner v. Linden Gittings
as 20-15536
Defendant / Appellee:
LINDEN GITTINGS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES N. BELSSNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02034
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belssner v. State of Nevada
as 2:2018cv02263
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
Charles N. Belssner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Belssner v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-17299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES N. BELSSNER
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA and JUAN A. GARCIA ALVARADO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
