Cases 1 - 10 of 32
MCCARTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05915
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD MCCARTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richards v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv03697
Plaintiff:
Russell Charles Richards
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
WRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD WRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NOELTNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02550
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD NOELTNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SALOGA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19671
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD SALOGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foerster, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv01624
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Foerster, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RICHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51478
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Enos v. Wells et al
as 8:2021cv02089
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ENOS
Defendant:
Charles Richard Wells, JOHN E SMITH II, Charles R. Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEMLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95525
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD LEMLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WENTZEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60001
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD WENTZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
