Cases 1 - 10 of 10
(HC) Scott v. Bird
as 2:2023cv00936
Petitioner:
Thomas Charles Scott
Respondent:
Landon Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Scott et al v. Gate Gourmet, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11033
Plaintiff:
Brenda McCoy, Dominique Ferdinand and Charles Scott
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100, inclusive and Gate Gourmet, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charles Scott v. Kuehne Nagel, Inc.
as 5:2018cv02533
Defendant:
Kuehne + Nagel, Inc., Kuehne Nagel, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Charles Scott v. Kuehne and Nagel, Inc.
as 5:2017cv01147
Defendant:
DOES and Kuehne + Nagel Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Stephen Fantl et al v. David Glenwinkel et al
as 4:2017cv02033
Plaintiff:
Stephen Fantl , Charles Scott Soloman , Jody Weaver and others
Defendant:
David Glenwinkel, Craig Beling, Ramin Amirebrahimi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Sherman
as 2:2016cv01957
Petitioner:
Thomas Charles Scott
Respondent:
Steward Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saide v. Cate
as 2:2011cv00790
Petitioner:
Charles Scott Saide
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Saide v. Cate
as 1:2011cv00418
Petitioner:
Charles Scott Saide
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Paul Wagner et al v. Landwin Partners Fund I, LLC et al
as 8:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Katherine Altieri, Stephen V. Barger, Eleuterio H. Bella, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Tom Casault, Sean C. Dennison, Does and others
Wagner et al v. Landwin Partners Fund I, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01515
Plaintiff:
Paul Wagner , Katherine Altieri , Stephen V. Barger and others
Defendant:
Landwin Partners Fund I, LLC, The Landwin Group, LLC, Landwin Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
