Cases 11 - 20 of 29
SMITH v. PROSECUTORS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY et al
as 2:2011cv06483
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
PROSECUTORS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48623
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv03387
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2011cv01830
Petitioner:
CHARLES SMITH
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv62986
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS CORP. , OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31009
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80289
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH and JOAN ELIZABETH SMITH
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., ARMSTRONG CORK COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34111
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34110
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
