Cases 41 - 50 of 168
Durruthy v. Charter Communications, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01374
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 and Charter Communications, LLC
Plaintiff:
Rosadela Durruthy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ivan Soto v. Charter Communications Holdings Company, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv06459
Defendant:
Time Warner Cable, Inc., Charter Communications Holdings Company, LLC, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hartigan v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01962
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Charter Communications, Inc. doing business as Spectrum and Infocision, Inc. doing business as Infocision Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Raeanon Hartigan
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Charter Communications, Inc. v. MarkMonitor, Inc.
as 3:2020mc80084
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Respondent:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Gonzales et al v. Charter Communications, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv02689
Plaintiff:
Michael Ralston, Ronald Flores, Norbeto Alarcon and others
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc. and Charter Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Charter Communications, Inc. v. Audible Magic, Inc.
as 5:2020mc80072
Petitioner:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Respondent:
Audible Magic, Inc.
Gene Moran v. Charter Communications, Inc.
as 8:2020cv00303
Plaintiff:
Gene Moran
Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
